Wells V Cooper
   HOME

TheInfoList



OR:

''Wells v. Cooper'' (1958) 2 All ER 527 is an
England and Wales Court of Appeal The Court of Appeal (formally "His Majesty's Court of Appeal in England", commonly cited as "CA", "EWCA" or "CoA") is the highest court within the Senior Courts of England and Wales, and second in the legal system of England and Wales only to ...
judgment dealing with the issue of standard of care in
English tort law English tort law concerns the compensation for harm to people's rights to health and safety, a clean environment, property, their economic interests, or their reputations. A "tort" is a wrong in civil, rather than criminal law, that usually requi ...
. The question in the case was what standard of care could be expected of a person who carries out repairs in his own house negligently, so that his visitors get injured as a result.


Facts

The
defendant In court proceedings, a defendant is a person or object who is the party either accused of committing a crime in criminal prosecution or against whom some type of civil relief is being sought in a civil case. Terminology varies from one jurisdic ...
, Mr Cooper fixed a new handle to his back door. The
plaintiff A plaintiff ( Π in legal shorthand) is the party who initiates a lawsuit (also known as an ''action'') before a court. By doing so, the plaintiff seeks a legal remedy. If this search is successful, the court will issue judgment in favor of the p ...
, Mr Wells, a visiting tradesman was leaving Cooper's house by the back door. When he pulled the door strongly in order to shut it, the handle came off and Wells fell, injuring himself. Expert evidence was given that Cooper should have used longer screws when attaching the handle.


Judgment

The Court of Appeal held that the degree of care and skill required of a householder undertaking his own repairs was to be measured not by reference to his own degree of personal competence but by reference to the degree of care and skill which a reasonably skilled amateur carpenter might be expected to apply to the work in question. The safety of their work was not to be judged by reference to the contractual obligations that might be owed to a professional carpenter working for reward since that would be too high a standard.Giliker and Beckwith, Tort Law, (4th Edition, 2011), p.152 Therefore, Mr Wells lost the case because the trial judge found that in this case, Mr Cooper satisfied the standard of a reasonably skilled amateur carpenter.


See also

*
Breach of duty in English law In English tort law, there can be no liability in negligence unless the claimant establishes both that they were owed a duty of care by the defendant, and that there has been a breach of that duty. The defendant is in breach of duty towards the ...
* Blyth v Birmingham Waterworks * Bolam v. Friern Hospital Management Committee * Wilsher v. Essex Area Health Authority * Mullin v. Richards


References

{{English law types English tort case law 1958 in case law 1958 in British law Court of Appeal (England and Wales) cases